nancylebov linked to
this. Fair warning: I haven't experienced it directly, for a couple of reasons*, so if you're interested please do.
She summarises the central idea as follows:
you need to leave out a lot (mostly the messiness of the real world) in order to make a compelling story, and that while you can't give up stories (they're built into human nature), it's worth developing dubiousness about getting engaged in them.It's certainly true that stories, like statues, are to some extent subtractive: once you know what your story's going to be, it's a case of chipping away everything that isn't the story. It's also true that you can't give up stories. If Mr Cowan is actually saying that you should treat stories with respect, then I agree with that too. If he's saying that stories can't be trusted, then I absolutely and totally disagree.
I would like anyone reading this who was not brought up on stories to put up their metaphorical hand. Given the generally wonderful nature of my readers, I could rest my case right there, but perhaps the argument deserves a tad more development.
Stories do not tell us what the world is like. That's a given. We have other things for that. Stories can contain facts, which are always useful, but that isn't what they're for. Stories are supposed to tell us (or, perhaps, lead us to discover what we believe about) what the world should (or should not) be like. That's if they tell us anything and don't simply beguile an hour or more in an entertaining fashion, which is also a perfectly valid justification for stories.
We live in a world where the news is lies, the food is poisoned, the air and water are polluted and anyone we meet on the street could be a mugger or a drunk driver or something. We have plenty and plenty to be cautious about. I would say that, within the bounds of reason, stories are one of the few things we can rely on not to betray us. As long as we play fair with them, they will always play fair with us. Destroying that bond of trust doesn't strike me as a good thing to do, in a time when it's a vanishingly rare resource and one we depend on more and more. In fact, the idea makes me quite angry. Plus, of course, stories are what I do, and readers getting engaged with them (enjoying them, finding them worthwhile) is about the only good that can come of what I do, and someone telling people not to do that is directly threatening the only purpose I've found for my life. Hence the heightened hackles.
If I have misunderstood based on the summary, I am sure someone will be swift to correct me.
*Oh, all right. One is that I know from the summary that I'm not going to be persuaded, and the other is that I'd rather keep my ears uncanned in case I get called or the phone rings or something. I've been doing music most of the morning and have used up my headphone time.